I was very disapointed of some artists, when I saw that they use real images like Hubble photos to create images they call their own. I think an artist is someone who makes art by himself and not a person who collects photos, pastes them on a shape and calls it something like "Supernebula".
And some of these artists REALLY have a name on DA.
Ah, and the most stupid people are the rippers. I cant say how I hate this shit.
I dont want to say any names but everybody who reads this should think about what he should do or not to concerning his OWN art.
Member of:
greetings
Ov3RMinD








I am also curious like Annis, if you would please notify me who you think these people might be (only out of curiousity), or atleast tell me if im one of them.
And you are not one of them, either.
yeah, its not really art when someone just copies... i suppose if it was extensively edited they could put it in photomanipulations. (that atleast, if they where to actually even submit it)
from scratch!
i swear!
you give the credit back for what you took. If not
then you are not an artist! Didn`t Bill Gates once
say, "good artists copy, great artists steal????"
You don't like it, fine that's your choice, that doesn't give you the right to claim they're not artists.
Actually you did say that, perhaps you didn't mean exactly what you said, but that's all I can go on.
If your opinion is different, I dont have any problems with that.